This rubric gets updated each time to include what an A* report will include. See if your report has everything.
See if you have gotten everything so far:
You are using a professional format
You have ‘hidden’ the output of your library code chunk.
A* option. You are also welcome to hide large code chunks, for example by using ‘include=FALSE’ as a code chunk option, or code folding in your yaml if your template allows it (some don’t). (https://bookdown.org/yihui/rmarkdown-cookbook/fold-show.html)
You have an author addition to your YAML code. See here for how to do it - https://zsmith27.github.io/rmarkdown_crash-course/lesson-4-yaml-headers.html
You have a table of contents. If you are using a prettydocs format, you cannot make it ‘float’ (that’s OK). But google the name of your template and table of contents. Or R YAML code floating table of contents.
You have used headers and sub-headers to allow the reader to navigate through the document. You can do this in view by selecting the text and clicking the arrow next to “Normal”. If you are in source mode, see here https://ucsbcarpentry.github.io/R-markdown/03-headings-lists/index.html
You have LOOKED at your final knitted file and made sure its how you expect.
You have spell checked your work. (spell check is next to the knit button - it’s a bit rubbish in that it will also flag things like web addresses, but it does the job)
You have written your report for a specific person/organisation (see project 2). Read your text as though you were that person. Does it make sense? Do you need to add in more background information?
You have FULLY described your dataset. Where it came from, how it was collected,
You have a BULLET POINT LIST of each column, what it means and the units it is in (see my worked example)
You have talked about any limitations of this data for that particular user. e.g. if it was collected in 2018, it won’t include the impacts of COVID.. or maybe one of the fallacies will be an issue.
You have discussed all the data wrangling and quality control that you did (consider putting this as a sub-header to make it easy to find)
You have eloquently described your initial analysis in a way that is useful to YOUR SPECIFIC READER. For example, maybe they might care about what types of sharks there are, or how many in each state, or that there are “less points in the west..” . E.g. there should be a clear thread through the narrative
You have read in your data
You have conducted initial quality control and data wrangling. E.g. removed missing values, filtered your data to a smaller area that makes more sense for your project (or to do point pattern analysis on).
Your plots are self sufficient (e.g. you have good formatting, axis names etc)
You have conducted initial exploratory analysis
You have made an sf version of your data
You have chosen an appropriate map projection in metres (almost certainly UTM for your location), converted your data and explained to the reader what you did.
You have made some initial maps of your data and explained them.
A* option. See the plotly library or https://r-graph-gallery.com/interactive-charts.html and make some of your charts interactive!